The Sensible Arya

India stands at a critical juncture where true national security demands iron-clad self-reliance, strategic autonomy, and ruthless prioritisation of indigenous capabilities. Yet, under the current regime since 2014, we have witnessed a systematic erosion of these pillars — indigenous defence programmes starved or sabotaged, massive funds funnelled into overpriced foreign weapons, and a dangerous web of US pacts that have made India increasingly dependent on Washington. This is not mere policy failure. It is a deliberate pattern that leaves our armed forces vulnerable, our strategic options limited, and our sovereignty compromised. 1. The Systematic Dismantling of Indigenous Defence Programmes Flagship programmes designed to give India independent deterrence and technological edge have been deprioritised, delayed, or diluted — all while the government cites “lack of funds” for home-grown R&D. GTRE Kaveri Engine Objective : Develop a fully indigenous afterburning turbofan engine (80-...

Right to Recall Is a Powerful Democratic Reform — But Only with a Strong and Proper Draft Right to Recall (RTR) is, in principle, one of the strongest tools of democratic accountability. The idea that citizens should not be forced to wait five years to correct a mistake aligns deeply with the spirit of representative democracy. However, history shows that a powerful reform without a carefully designed draft can create instability instead of accountability . Today, multiple recall proposals are being discussed: Haryana Government’s Sarpanch Recall Law Varun Gandhi’s Recall Proposal Raghav Chadha’s recent recall advocacy Right to Recall Party’s (RRP) VoteVapsi Model This article compares them and explains why drafting determines whether recall strengthens democracy — or weakens it. 1️⃣ The Core Difference: Negative Recall vs Positive Recall Before comparing individuals and states, we must understand the structural divide: 🔹 Negative Recall Focuses only on removing the elected representa...

In an age dominated by slogans, emotional politics, and ideological extremes, I believe it is important to clearly articulate a sensible, grounded, and internally consistent worldview . This piece lays out my ideological position on governance, society, economics, and the role of the state—not as dogma, but as a rational framework rooted in accountability, liberty, and merit. 1. The Core Purpose of the State The state, the government, and the law are not meant to micromanage society , engineer morality, or control personal lives. Their role is limited but crucial . In my view, the state has four primary responsibilities: a) Ensuring Justice Justice must be visible, accessible, and fair . A society cannot function if justice is delayed, selective, or captured by elites. To strengthen justice: Courts should move toward citizen jury systems , reducing excessive judicial centralization. Justice should reflect collective moral reasoning , not just institutional authority. b) Accountability ...

Why Do Many Indians Develop Contempt for Their Own People? A Colonial Legacy Sustained by Paid Media and Intellectual Elites** One of the most disturbing traits visible in modern India is the ease with which Indians express contempt—sometimes outright hatred—towards their own fellow citizens. Ordinary people are routinely described as ignorant, corrupt, uncivilized, irrational, casteist, misogynistic, sexually frustrated, and incapable of self-governance. This contempt is not accidental. It is manufactured , institutionalized , and continuously reinforced through education, media, and elite intellectual discourse. At its core, this mindset is a colonial inheritance , carefully preserved and repackaged for post-independence India. Colonial Justifications and Their Psychological Aftermath During the freedom struggle, when Indians demanded independence and voting rights, the British justified their rule by claiming that Indians : Lacked moral character Were ignorant and sel...