Reforming Justice: Why India Needs a Jury System to Fight Corruption and Ensure Fairness

 Reforming Justice: Why India Needs a Jury System to Fight Corruption and Ensure Fairness

A society or nation progresses when it rewards the good and discourages the bad. The principles of Dharma—justice, fairness, and righteousness—are the foundation of a balanced and thriving society.

However, anti-social elements in human society are the biggest obstacles to achieving Dharma in its true essence. When these elements go unchecked, it leads to a state of Matsya-Nyaya, or anarchy, where the strong prey on the weak—much like how a big fish swallows a small one.

To prevent this chaos, Dand Niti—the policy of punishment and enforcement—is essential. Dand Niti ensures that those who disrupt social harmony are controlled, and it persuades everyone to follow the dictates of Dharma.

Who Will Punish the Wrongdoers?

The responsibility of maintaining order and delivering justice lies with the judiciary. The judiciary's role is to punish the wrong and protect the innocent.

But what happens when the judiciary fails?

Failure to deliver justice leads to lawlessness:

-Criminals commit crimes without fear of consequences.

-Rapes, corruption, and murders go unchecked.

-Gangsters and rapists roam freely because of a corrupt system.

This is the harsh reality of the Indian judicial system, which is plagued by corruption at its core.

The Problem with India's Judge-Based System

India’s judicial system is judge-based, where a single judge delivers the final verdict. This system is inherently flawed because it allows the formation of a nexus between judges and lawyers.

Here’s how this nexus corrupts the system:

Judges and lawyers collaborate to exploit cases for financial gain.

Big corporations use their influence and money to legally terrorize small businesses and innovators.

Gangsters and rapists escape justice by bribing their way out of trials.

This corruption stifles progress and prevents India from becoming a superpower. To move forward, we need an efficient and corruption-free judicial system.

The Solution: Replace the Judge System with a Jury System.

The jury system is a type of justice system where the judgment is delivered by a group of randomly selected citizens, known as the jury, instead of a single judge.

How the Jury System Works:

1. Random Selection: Jury members are selected randomly from the citizens’ register of the area where the trial is held.

2. Size of the Jury: The jury size can vary between 12 to 500 members, depending on the complexity of the case.

3. Presentation of Evidence: Both sides present their evidence before the jury.

4. Deliberation and Judgment: Jury members discuss and deliver the final verdict.

5. Judge’s Role: A judge is present to maintain the decorum of the court but doesn’t influence the verdict.

6. One-Time Service: Jury members receive financial compensation for their participation and are disbanded after the trial. They cannot serve again for the next 5–10 years.

Why the Jury System Is Better

The random selection of jury members eliminates the possibility of corruption, as:

There’s no pre-existing connection between jury members and the parties involved.

Bribery becomes nearly impossible because of the large and temporary nature of the jury.

This ensures that justice is impartial and that the rich and powerful cannot manipulate the system.

Benefits of a Jury System

1. Justice for All: The jury system ensures fairness, protecting small businesses and innovators from exploitation by large corporations.

2. Boost to Innovation: By safeguarding the interests of small businesses, the system encourages innovation and scientific progress.

3. Accountability: Criminals, no matter how powerful, are held accountable.

Global Examples

Many developed nations, such as the USA and Great Britain, have adopted the jury system. This system has enabled:

-The trial of powerful individuals, like Hunter Biden, the son of US President Joe Biden.

-The flourishing of small businesses and inventors, free from the clutches of oppressive powers.

When the jury system was introduced in Great Britain, it broke the monopoly of monarchs and feudal lords. This shift boosted innovation and eventually gave Britain a technological edge that helped it dominate globally.

Conclusion

If India wants to progress and establish itself as a global superpower, it must reform its judicial system. Replacing the judge-based system with a jury system will reduce corruption, ensure justice for all, and create an environment where innovation and fairness thrive.

Let’s work towards a future where justice isn’t a privilege but a right for everyone.