The Data Protection Deception: A Law to Shield the Corrupt, Not Protect the People

By The Sensible Arya


The Government of India recently notified the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Rules under the DPDP Act, 2023.

On the surface, this may sound like a progressive move — a step towards privacy, digital empowerment, and data sovereignty.

But dig deeper, and you’ll realize:

This law isn’t made to protect you. It’s designed to protect the corrupt.

It’s a shield for politicians, babus, billionaires — and a sword against journalists, whistleblowers, and citizens who dare to speak the truth.



 What This Law Claims To Be

The official narrative:

 "The DPDP Act empowers citizens to control their personal data. It’s a digital shield against corporate and state overreach."

Sounds noble, right?

But what they don’t tell you is:

● There is no proper safeguard for journalists or public interest disclosures.

● The government has granted itself sweeping exemptions from the same privacy standards it imposes on others.

● The law can be used to criminalize truth-telling.



 What This Law Really Does

1. Turns Every Corrupt Politician’s Data Into a Legal Weapon

Under this law, any personal information — phone call recordings, property details, leaked documents, audio clips — can be labeled as “personal data.”

And unless you’ve taken “explicit consent” from the person involved (yes, the same corrupt official), you’re legally in violation.

So if a journalist exposes a land scam or bribery deal with proof,

The corrupt official can sue them, claim breach of privacy, and demand takedown + fine

The crime isn’t the corruption anymore — it’s the act of exposing it.


 2. No Public Interest Exception for Media or Whistleblowers

Unlike the EU's GDPR, which protects journalists and whistleblowers acting in the public interest, India's law offers no such exemption.

● There’s no immunity for investigative journalism.

● There’s no protection for leaked documents in the public good.

● There’s no recognition of dissent as a democratic right.

This law deliberately blurs the line between truth and illegality — so that truth becomes punishable.


3. Massive Fines to Silence Small Voices

Under the Act, the Data Protection Board can impose fines up to ₹250 crore for “violations.”

Imagine a YouTuber exposing a corrupt MLA using leaked documents.

Under this law, that MLA can:

● File a complaint

● Claim emotional harm and privacy violation

● Get the channel taken down or fined into bankruptcy

This law doesn’t just censor — it financially crushes.


4. The State Is Exempt From Your Privacy

Section 17(2) of the Act exempts the government from needing consent if:

● It claims “national interest,” or

● It’s conducting “public order” activities

So:

They can collect your data without asking.

● But you can't expose their wrongdoing even with proof.

It's not a Data Protection Law.

It's a Data Weaponization Framework.



Distraction While Democracy Was Dismantled

While all of this was being enforced, the government didn’t hold proper public consultations, nor did major media houses highlight the dangers.

Why?

Because they were too busy covering:

● Cricket tournaments

● Bollywood drama

● Useless panel debates on non-issues

This tactic has a name: Legislate in the Shadows.


Pass the law quietly.

Keep the public emotionally distracted.

Let the damage happen before anyone notices.



The Future They’re Building

A future where:

Exposing a corrupt officer is illegal.

● Telling the truth without “consent” is a punishable offense.

● The state watches everything.

● But no one can watch the state.


If Orwell was Indian, this is the dystopia he would have written about.



 Final Word: You’re Not Being Protected — You’re Being Controlled

The Digital Personal Data Protection law is not a victory for privacy.

It’s a calculated tool to:

Criminalize accountability

● Protect the powerful

● And silence anyone who dares to challenge the system


This law doesn’t make you safer.

It makes the corrupt untouchable.


It’s not just undemocratic.

It’s anti-India as it'll protect traitors of the masses.


✊ Stand up. Speak out. Before speaking itself becomes illegal.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I do not support Modi Government?

Amul: The Cooperative Model that Empowered India's Dairy Farmers

Rooftop Koreans: An example advocating for the importance of citizen ownership of firearms

Crypto Christianity: Rome's Downfall and India's Warning

When Bhagat Singh was invited by Joseph Stalin

Problems in Real Estate sector and its possible solution

Why India Needs Access to the Rafale Source Code – And the Risks of Not Having It

Banda Singh Bahadur:- Journey from Bairagi to Bahadur

How BJP use Waqf board to fuel its politics of hate despite Waqf board being a defacto government body?

The Great Indian Brain Drain: Who Really Benefits from the IIT Dream?